Peer-review

ETFLIN journals follow efficient, double-blind peer review guided by COPE Ethical Guidelines.

Core Principles

Timeline

Standard review within 14 business days. Prompt communication is required for any delays.

Anonymity

Double-blind protocol. No communication between reviewers and authors is permitted.

Affiliation Policy

Reviewers must have different affiliations from authors and each other to minimize conflicts and ensure diverse, independent perspectives.

Expertise Criteria

  • • Advanced Degree (Ph.D., MD, or equivalent)
  • • Proven publication record in reputable journals
  • • Active practical or academic field experience

Review Workflow

STEP 01

Preparation

Anonymization & watermark application.

STEP 02

Invitation

5-day response window for referees.

STEP 03

Peer-Review Submission

Comments, scores & recommendation.

STEP 04

Assessment

1–7 days for Editor decision.

STEP 05

Revision

Author improvements or second round.

Review Assessment Points

Language & Style

Research Background

Methodology

Results & Discussion

Conclusion

References

Scoring Legend

0: No Changes 1: Can Improve 2: Must Improve 3: Extensive

Reviewer Recognition

  • Certificate of Recognition
  • Named Recognition in Articles
  • Priority Submission Status

Strictly Prohibited Activities

Personal References

Suggesting citations that don't enhance content quality.

Author Contact

Intentional or unintentional direct contact with authors.

Manipulating Review

Biasing outcomes for personal or institutional interests.

Unethical Comments

Discriminative, disrespectful, or non-constructive feedback.

For further questions, contact the Editorial Office via halo@etflin.com.

Peer-review