Share The Article
Share The Article

Hey there! If you're enjoying the article you're reading, why not share it with your friends and spread the knowledge? Let's make sure everyone gets a chance to benefit from this great read!

You can also tag us on social media and we would be happy to re-post it. Here are our social media accounts:

Instagram: @etflin
Twitter: @Etflin1
Facebook: Etflin

Cite The Article
Cite The Article

Export the citation:




Citation
ACS Style

Bakhrushina, E.O., Buraya, L.M., Moiseev, E.D., Shumkova, M.M., Davydova, M.A., Krasnyuk, I.I. Optimizing Abiraterone Delivery through Intratumoral In Situ Implant: A Prospective Pharmaceutical Development Approach. Sciences of Pharmacy 2023, 2(2), 37-45.

AMA Style

Bakhrushina, EO, Buraya, LM, Moiseev, ED, Shumkova, MM, Davydova, MA, Krasnyuk, II. Optimizing Abiraterone Delivery through Intratumoral In Situ Implant: A Prospective Pharmaceutical Development Approach. Sciences of Pharmacy. 2023; 2(2):37-45.

Chicago Style

Elena O Bakhrushina, Liliya M Buraya, Egor D Moiseev, Marina M Shumkova, Maria A Davydova, Ivan I Krasnyuk. 2023. "Optimizing Abiraterone Delivery through Intratumoral In Situ Implant: A Prospective Pharmaceutical Development Approach" Sciences of Pharmacy 2, no. 2:37-45.

The Article's Metrics
The Article's Metrics

AI Dimensions Metrics


PlumX Metrics by Elsevier

Optimizing Abiraterone Delivery through Intratumoral In Situ Implant: A Prospective Pharmaceutical Development Approach

Article Access

Views: 155
Downloads: 10
Author Name

Corresponding Author


Affiliation


ORCID


Check the author works here


Article Reference
Reference



Check the reference here



Home

Journal

Articles

Login
Latest Articles from Sciences of Pharmacy

Table of Contents

(clickable & vertically scrollable)

Home / Sciences of Pharmacy / Volume 2 Issue 2 / 10.58920/sciphar02020037

Review

Optimizing Abiraterone Delivery through Intratumoral In Situ Implant: A Prospective Pharmaceutical Development Approach

by Elena O Bakhrushina , Liliya M Buraya , Egor D Moiseev , Marina M Shumkova , Maria A Davydova , Ivan I Krasnyuk

Academic editor: Georgy Prosvirkin
Sciences of Pharmacy 2(2): 37-45 (2023); https://doi.org/10.58920/sciphar02020037
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License.


Received
31 Mar 2023
Revised
20 Apr 2023
Accepted
22 Apr 2023
Published
08 May 2023

Abstract: Abiraterone acetate is one of the effective therapies in castration-resistant prostate cancer. There is only one dosage form in the form of film-coated tablets. Abiraterone has proven effective but has disadvantages and contraindications that complicate therapy. One of them is a positive food effect affecting the bioavailability and side effects of the drug. Abiraterone is taken strictly on an empty stomach, and the bioavailability of the drug, in this case, reaches only 10%. In addition, the drug is contraindicated in people with hepatic insufficiency since the main metabolism is in the liver. These and other disadvantages can be eliminated by obtaining targeted delivery systems - liposomes and nanocrystals. Another dosage form could be considered for the active pharmaceutical agent that would be cost-effective, accessible and have higher bioavailability for effective treatment. An intratumoral polymeric in situ implant is chosen as an excellent dosage form, the matrix of which will contain an optimized form of abiraterone, which can stably target a tumor.

Keywords: Abiraterone acetateBioavailabilityIn situTumorsChemotherapyIntratumoral implantation


1. Introduction

Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cancer globally, affecting men of all racial and ethnic groups. PC leads to high mortality among most middle-aged and older men from 45 to 60 years due to late diagnosis among people belonging to a low social class and ineffective treatment (1). In addition, besides social and environmental influence, there is a genetic influence leading to gene mutations. Long-term studies confirm that one of the genetic risk factors is heredity, which reduces the chances of survival (2). To date, there is no single specific test for prostate cancer. It is traditionally diagnosed using a rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, and a prostate needle biopsy. 

If the tumor is localized, PC treatment includes stereotactic radiotherapy, radical prostatectomy, and active surveillance. In most cases, after chemical or surgical castration, patients experience recurrence or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), radiation therapy, or chemotherapy. Each listed treatment method is costly, energy-consuming, has serious side effects, toxic, resistance to treatment, and is a prerequisite for developing concomitant diseases (3). Therefore, we should find a cost-effective and effective drug in the most convenient dosage form that allows high bioavailability for the maximum therapeutic effect and is effective in combination with other drugs, regardless of the stage and metastasis of PC. Based on the previous report, abiraterone is chosen as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), which has proven to be a very effective first-line drug for mCRPC. 

Abiraterone acetate, a prodrug of abiraterone, is a selective and irreversible antagonist of the cytochrome P450 (CYP17) enzyme, which plays a key role in androgen biosynthesis in testes, adrenal glands, and prostate tumor cells. Further use of abiraterone results in virtually undetectable serum and intratumor androgen levels. Abiraterone acetate is combined with low doses of prednisolone to overcome side effects since inhibition of CYP17 reduces the production of endogenous glucocorticoids. Abiraterone acetate rapidly hydrolyzes to abiraterone and reaches its maximum plasma concentration within two hours. However, the absolute bioavailability of the drug is still not studied due to its low solubility and permeability (4). Abiraterone acetate is taken orally in tablet form on an empty stomach. The rationale for this recommendation is that the drug's bioavailability is influenced by the amount of dietary fat ingested, which can substantially impact the drug's efficacy (5). In addition to low bioavailability, abiraterone is contraindicated with severe hepatic insufficiency since the drug is metabolized mainly in the liver, which leads to reduced drug elimination and increased levels of aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) and bilirubin in the blood test (6). Despite the disadvantages, the drug has a proven efficacy in an inverse relationship: an increase in the concentration of abiraterone and a decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Also, an increase in survival, the average life expectancy, and the overall quality of PC patients occur (7).

There have been previous attempts to increase the bioavailability of abiraterone. For example, the concept of the formulation of oil balls with a dissolved drug was developed, where it was proved to increase the bioavailability of abiraterone by 2.7 times in AUC and 4.0 times in Cmax (8). It is also worthwhile to mention the experience of developing a lipid-based formula for abiraterone acetate using a supersaturated silica and lipid hybrid (super-SLH) approach to achieve high drug loading (9). As a result, a higher level of solubilization was achieved compared to Zytiga. And in a study by Urvi Gala et al. (10) with the help of KinetiSol technology, they were engaged in the formation of a solid amorphous dispersion of abiraterone. At the end of the trial, the potential to eliminate the food effect and increase the solubility of abiraterone was found. Despite the above examples, the issue of bioavailability, cost-effectiveness, and production rate of a bioavailable API is still open.

Thus, this review aims to substantiate the need and prospects for developing a new effective targeted delivery system for chemotherapy using abiraterone - an intratumoral in situ system.

2. Main part

PC is an androgen-dependent malignant neoplasm. First, it was demonstrated in 1941 in Huggins and Hodges's research, which showed that lowering serum androgen levels by orchiectomy or administration of exogenous oestrogen caused tumor regression and symptomatic relief (11). Huggins and Hodges were awarded the Nobel Prize for this research. Drugs that block androgen synthesis were used as first-line therapy (12). As the primary treatment, androgen deprivation is usually achieved by orchidectomy or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs, often combined with androgen receptor antagonists to block residual adrenal androgens. However, a problem remains unresolved, and almost all patients eventually relapse (13). Second-line treatment included alternative endocrine manipulations and chemotherapy.

 Therefore, when it became relevant to the use of P450 inhibitors, it was found to provide maximum ablation of androgens after a single use, blocking their synthesis in the testicles and adrenal glands. High-dose ketoconazole was used, but not widely due to severe side effects. Medical adrenalectomy (aminoglutethimide + hydrocortisone) has become obsolete by generalizing maximum androgen blockade in first-line treatment (14).

In reviewing articles related to the development and research of abiraterone acetate, the PubMed database was analyzed from 1994 with a research of the cytochrome P450 steroid inhibitors pharmacology (15). According to the previous works, the search for an effective CYP17 inhibitor dates back to the 60s of the last century (16). But since the 90s, work has begun researching the abiraterone acetate effectiveness and its application (17). The molecule was first discovered in 1990 at a research center in London by Dr. Jerry Potter (18).

Gerhardt Attard et al. reviewed a Phase I clinical trial of abiraterone acetate in chemo-naive men with prostate cancer resistant to multiple hormonal therapies (19). Patients took the drug up to 5 doses at a time (from 250 to 2000 mg), and it was found that abiraterone acetate is tolerated very well. Antitumor activity was observed at all doses. Since CYP17 catalyzes the last step in androgen biosynthesis, target inhibition should affect the production of androgens by the testes and the adrenal glands. Therefore, abiraterone acetate has advantages over existing therapies, such as LHRH analogs.

Phase II research has indicated a significant decrease in PSA levels among castration-resistant patients treated with abiraterone before and after cytotoxic chemotherapy. And in phase III, the drug proved to be quite promising in randomized trials in patients with progression of mCRPC during docetaxel-based chemotherapy (20).

2.1 Problems of low bioavailability

According to the biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS) (21), abiraterone belongs to class IV drugs and has many characteristics that are problematic for effective oral administration. These include low solubility, low solubilization, and unstable food bioavailability. The latter is the subject of a study by Marlies Braeckmans et al. (22), who explored the positive food effect of oral abiraterone acetate (commercial name "Zytiga", approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2011). The prodrug is an ester of the abiraterone active compound and is a prime example of a highly lipophilic drug that dissolves better in human intestinal fluids after meals. Despite this, the prodrug should be taken on an empty stomach to avoid side effects of unstable bioavailability (23). Due to limited absorption on an empty stomach, the dose is 1000 mg daily, mainly excreted in the feces (24). In the experiment for this study was using the intact intestinal barrier, which is present in the in situ perfusion method in rats with mesenteric and blood sampling. After evaluating satiety imitation in vitro, lipids and cleaved lipid products increased abiraterone acetate solubility but limited abiraterone permeability. Then these processes were combined into an in situ perfusion model in rats. At a static state of satiety, the concentration of abiraterone in the perfusate was very high, contributing to active absorption. But during digestion, an increased flow of abiraterone was observed compared to fasting, despite its low concentration in the perfusate (22). Thus, at the moment, the mechanisms of the positive food effect are not elucidated. And the question is still open where additional studies are required to evaluate lipid digestion and its impact on abiraterone.

2.2 Solution

Despite the problem of positive food effects, several technologies have recently been developed to increase the solubility and bioavailability of drugs that do not have these functions. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) based on beeswax and theobroma oil in a 1:1 ratio are one example, which remain in a solid state upon drug release and effectively prevent premature leakage (25). These technologies also include polymer micelles, which are a means for dissolving insoluble or poorly soluble chemical compounds and loading the drug exceeding its mass (26). The oral bioavailability improvement is addressed by modeling absorption based on in vitro dissolution measurements, mathematically predicting dose-absorbed fractions in different biorelevant media (27). Orsolya Basa-Dénes et al. developed a nano amorphous formulation of abiraterone acetate by enzymatic hydrolysis that demonstrated higher obvious solubility and dissolution rate, and significantly improved absorption and fasting bioavailability in beagle dogs, significantly altering the pharmacokinetics of the drug (28). Also, continuous flow precipitation technology obtained the new form of abiraterone acetate. It allows the compound to be rapidly absorbed and predicts that a dose of 250mg of the new drug will give the same exposure as 1000 mg Zytiga in the fasted state. Thus, the toxic effect is reduced (29). Other work presented a rational approach to developing new drug formulations to increase fasting bioavailability. As in the previous example, precipitation experiments were performed in biorelevant media to evaluate drug precipitation. Two main approaches areused to form the new abiraterone. The first approach is to suppress precipitation from a supersaturated solution. At the same time, the second is based on the hypothesis that adjusting the drug's release can achieve its optimal absorption. Both approaches increase the fasting bioavailability of abiraterone acetate, with up to 250% increased bioavailability in experimental animals compared to the parent drug having a сrystal lattice structure (30). In the following article, Hayley B Schultz et al. investigated the efficacy of silica-lipid hybrids (CLG) and supersaturated silica-lipid hybrids (pCLG), where CLG showed a 1.43-fold improvement in the oral bioavailability of abiraterone acetate (31). 

In 2021 research, cyclodextrin complexes were developed to encapsulate the drug and improve solubility using the example of gold compounds, which almost completely retained their biological activity when creating the complex (32). These studies were continued with citrate-mediated synthesized gold nanoparticles with immobilized surrogate antibodies that were bioconjugated into the substantially potent drug abiraterone for development as a combinatorial therapeutic agent against prostate cancer (33). However, Yuanfen Liu et al. (34) created nanocrystalline tablets of abiraterone acetate, which increased oral bioavailability. This dosage form is obtained by the dry granulation method, where freeze-dried nanocrystals, fillers, stabilizers, and disintegrants are precisely weighed, mixed, and then compressed into flakes. The formula has been optimized and stable. As a result, the rate of abiraterone acetate nanocrystal tablets is similar to the Zytiga reference tablet in vitro, while the in vivo oral bioavailability is increased by 2.8 times, indicating that the nanocrystals can effectively improve the oral absorption of insoluble drugs. It is also interesting to study the synthesis of a low molecular weight abiraterone conjugate targeting the prostate-specific antigen membrane. The conjugate showed a preferential effect on prostate tumor cells, reducing prostate-specific membrane antigen expression and showing significantly reduced acute toxicity with comparable efficacy compared to abiraterone acetate (35).

Nanocrystals, or nanosuspensions, are semi-crystalline structures with an API and surrounding stabilizers (36). The drug shows absolute safety and stability if the excipients are used in small quantities. Then it is also suitable for injection and inhalation procedures (37). API dissolved in nanocrystals can be absorbed in the molecular state due to passive or transcellular transport reaching the bloodstream (38). These facts suggest that nanocrystals can be used for in situ implant dosage form, although the problems of stabilization and prolongation should still be solved.

3. In Situ Systems as a Solution of Classical Intratumoral Implants in Modern Chemotherapy

Compared with intravenous or oral administration, direct intratumoral in situ drug delivery reduces systemic absorption, general side effects, and increased chemotherapy toxicity and targets the API directly to the tumor (39). Classical implants are biodegradable polymers of various structures implanted directly inside the tumor (for example, needle type) or located directly around it (40). There are also intratumoral injections, the introduction of which is associated with less traumatic manipulation (41). However, unlike the implant, injections do not have a prolongation, are more toxic, and the high pressure of the interstitial fluid of the tumor prevents the drug from being delayed at the injection site. Modern targeted delivery systems (in situ systems) change their states of matter due to a phase transition at the injection site. They can become a compromise that combines the effectiveness of classical implants and the convenience of injections (42). The formation of an in situ implant occurs due to the tumor's pathological factors, the injection site's physiological characteristics, or exposure from outside - irradiation or heating of the implantation site (43). 

To date, a commercially available drug for intratumoral implantation is GLIADEL® Wafer, a biodegradable implant for treating brain cancer (44). This type of implant requires surgical intervention, as it is placed at the site of the removed tumor for further treatment and prevention of recurrence. However, due to the procedure's invasiveness, there is a risk of complications like pain, bleeding, or infection if the therapeutic effect is not achieved. Considering this issue, Changkyu Lee (45) developed a starch-based needle implant with high rigidity, injected or using an endoscope in case of difficult tumor access. Starch is an inexpensive, readily available, and biodegradable biopolymer. When heated, the crystal lattice structure is destroyed, and the starch acquires a gel-like structure (46,47). Such a texture easily acquires the required shape and size, and the API is encapsulated (for example, stabilized nanocrystals of the active substance can be considered). The starch recrystallizes and becomes ready for use. Since the industrial production of starch implants is very economical and easily reproducible, it can be assumed that this method can become a new strategy for treating cancerous tumors.

4. Perspective on the development of the in situ implant of abiraterone acetate

The low levels of solubility and absorption of abiraterone, characteristic of the BCS class 4 API, limit the possibilities of using this API in situ systems. The first step in the pharmaceutical development of a new delivery system for abiraterone will be the selection of an appropriate solvent or optimal solubilization process. The choice of the stimulating factor and the composition of the system matrix will depend on the chosen method (48). For example, using thermosensitive matrices based on poloxamers can give unsatisfactory results for abiraterone acetate since poloxamers often cannot solubilize BCS class 2 and 4 APIs (49). Simultaneously, the creation of systems such as solid dispersions that can solve the problem of abiraterone acetate solubility may also not give positive results due to the aggregative instability of the complex (50). Thus, phase-sensitive matrices in which the API is dissolved in a suitable indifferent non-aqueous solvent (NMP, etc.) diffuse into the surrounding soft tissues after injection can be identified as promising in situ systems for the delivery of abiraterone.

5. Conclusion

Intratumoral implantation with abiraterone can become an adequate replacement for the oral dosage form. Its advantages include optimized API, prolongation, high targeting, good tolerability, and no systemic effects. It can positively affect the quality of life of people taking this drug. In addition, the implant can be widely used due to the choice of cost-effective and affordable means of production. Despite the current problem of the stability and bioavailability of abiraterone, there are great chances for a positive trend for treating PC.

Funding

No funding sources were used to assist in preparing this review

Acknowledgment

The acknowledgment section is your opportunity to thank those who have helped and supported you personally and professionally during the research process or in making the paper.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

Data Availability

Unpublished data can be provided upon request to the author.

Authors contribution

Conceptualization       : Elena O. Bakhrushina; Ivan I. Krasnyuk

Investigation               : Liliya M. Buraya; Egor D. Moiseev; Maria A. Davydova

Supervision                 : Elena O. Bakhrushina; Ivan I. Krasnyuk

Administration            : Marina M. Shumkova

Writing and Editing     : Elena O. Bakhrushina; Marina M. Shumkova; Liliya M. Buraya

References

1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Soerjomataram I, Bray F Cancer Today (powered by GLOBOCAN 2018) IARC CancerBase No. 15 ISBN-13 978-92-832-0453-4

2. Termini D., Hartogh DJD, Jaglanian A., Tsiani E. Curcumin against Prostate Cancer: Current Evidence Biomolecules. 2020 Nov 10;10(11):1536. doi: 10.3390/biom10111536

3. Bach C., Pisipati S., Daneshwar D., Wright M., Rowe E., Gillatt D., Persad R., Koupparis A. The status of surgery in the management of high-risk prostate cancer Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Jun;11(6):342-51. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.100.

4. Ryan CJ, Smith MR, Fong L, Rosenberg JE, Kantoff P, Raynaud F, et al. Phase I clinical trial of the CYP17 inhibitor abiraterone acetate demonstrating clinical activity in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who received prior ketoconazole therapy J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 20;28(9):1481-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1281.

5. US FDA. Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutical Review: Zytiga (abiraterone acetate) Silver Spring: FDA USA; 2010. С. 1–86

6. Marbury T, Lawitz E, Stonerock R, Gonzalez M, Jiao J, Breeding J, et al. Single-dose pharmacokinetic studies of abiraterone acetate in men with hepatic or renal impairment J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jul;54(7):732-41. doi: 10.1002/jcph.253.

7. European Medicines Agency. European Public Assessment Report (EPAR): Zytiga (abiraterone acetate) London: European Medicines Agency; 2016

8. Tereza Boleslavská et al Bioavailability Enhancement and Food Effect Elimination of Abiraterone Acetate by Encapsulation in Surfactant-Enriched Oil Marbles AAPS J. 2020 Sep 25;22(6):122. doi: 10.1208/s12248-020-00505-5. PMID: 32978690  DOI: 10.1208/s12248-020-00505-5

9. Hayley B Schultz et al Supersaturated-Silica Lipid Hybrids Improve in Vitro Solubilization of Abiraterone Acetate Pharm Res . 2020 Mar 31;37(4):77. doi: 10.1007/s11095-020-02795-y. PMID: 32236761  DOI: 10.1007/s11095-020-02795-y

10. Urvi Gala et al Improved Dissolution and Pharmacokinetics of Abiraterone through KinetiSol Enabled Amorphous Solid Dispersions® Pharmaceutics. 2020 Apr; 12(4): 357. Published online 2020 Apr 14. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12040357

11. Yien Ning Sophia Wong et al Evolution of androgen receptor targeted therapy for advanced prostate cancer Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun;11(6):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.72. Epub 2014 May 20

12. Nils Hansson et al Remembering Charles B. Huggins’ Nobel Prize for Hormonal Treatment of Prostatic Cancer at its 50th Anniversary European Urology 69(6) DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.030

13. L J Denis Controversies in the management of localized and metastatic prostatic cancer Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(3):333-41. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90542-l.

14. R De Coster , W WoutersJ Bruynseels P450-dependent enzymes as targets for prostate cancer therapy · J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1996 Jan;56(1-6 Spec No):133-43. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(95)00230-8

15. S E Barrie et al Pharmacology of novel steroidal inhibitors of cytochrome P450(17) alpha (17 alpha-hydroxylase/C17-20 lyase) J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1994 Sep;50(5-6):267-73.

 doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(94)90131-7.

16. P F HALL et al THE EFFECT OF INTERSTITIAL CELL-STIMULATING HORMONE ON THE PRODUCTION OF PREGNENOLONE BY RABBIT TESTIS IN THE PRESENCE OF AN INHIBITOR OF 17-ALPHA-HYDROXYLASE PMID: 14192912 DOI: 10.1016/0304-4165(64)90100-x

17. Y Ideyama et al Novel nonsteroidal inhibitor of cytochrome P450(17alpha) (17alpha-hydroxylase/C17-20 lyase), YM116, decreased prostatic weights by reducing serum concentrations of testosterone and adrenal androgens in rats Prostate. 1998 Sep 15;37(1):10-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(19980915)37:1<10::aid-pros3>3.0.co;2-c.

18. MARK SCHOLZ, MD & RALPH H. BLUM Prostate Snatchers: The Story of Gerry Potter, The Discoverer of Zytiga Tuesday, April 24, 2012 

19. Gerhardt Attard et al Phase I clinical trial of a selective inhibitor of CYP17, abiraterone acetate, confirms that castration-resistant prostate cancer commonly remains hormone driven J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct 1;26(28):4563-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9749.

20. Yu Chen et al Antiandrogens and androgen depleting therapies in prostate cancer: novel agents for an established target Lancet Oncol. 2009 Oct;10(10):981-91. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70229-3.

21.Rohan Ghadi , Neha Dand BCS class IV drugs: Highly notorious candidates for formulation development J Control Release. 2017 Feb 28;248:71-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.014.

22. Marlies Braeckmans et al Investigating the Mechanisms behind the Positive Food Effect of Abiraterone Acetate: In Vitro and Rat In Situ Studies, Pharmaceutics. 2022 Apr 28;14(5):952. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14050952

23. Sophie Geboers et al The Effect of Food on the Intraluminal Behavior of Abiraterone Acetate in Man J Pharm Sci. 2016 Sep;105(9):2974-2981. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 Apr 7

24. Milin Acharya et al A phase I, open-label, single-dose, mass balance study of 14C-labeled abiraterone acetate in healthy male subjects Xenobiotica. 2013 Apr;43(4):379-89. doi: 10.3109/00498254.2012.721022. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

25. Hilda Amekyeh , Nashiru Billa Lyophilized Drug-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Formulated with Beeswax and Theobroma Oil Molecules. 2021 Feb 9;26(4):908. doi: 10.3390/molecules26040908.

26. Michael M. Lübtow et al Ultra‐High to Ultra‐Low Drug‐Loaded Micelles: Probing Host–Guest Interactions by Fluorescence Spectroscopy Chemistry. 2019 Sep 25; 25(54): 12601–12610. Published online 2019 Sep 2 https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201902619

27. Tamás Solymosi et al Development of an abiraterone acetate formulation with improved oral bioavailability guided by absorption modeling based on in vitro dissolution and permeability measurements doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.09.031.

28. Orsolya Basa-Dénes et al Investigations of the mechanism behind the rapid absorption of nano-amorphous abiraterone acetate doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.01.001.

29. Tamás Solymosi et al Novel formulation of abiraterone acetate might allow significant dose reduction and eliminates substantial positive food effect doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3406-6

30. Tereza Boleslavská et al Preclinical evaluation of new formulation concepts for abiraterone acetate bioavailability enhancement based on the inhibition of pH-induced precipitation doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.04.005.

31. Hayley B Schultz et al Enhancement of abiraterone acetate oral bioavailability by supersaturated-silica lipid hybrids DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119264

32. Damiano Cirri et al Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes of Auranofin and Its Iodido Analog: A Chemical and Biological Study Pharmaceutics. 2021 May; 13(5): 727. Published online 2021 May 15 

33. Abu Baker et al Targeted non AR mediated smart delivery of abiraterone to the prostate cancer doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272396

34. Yuanfen Liu et al Development of Abiraterone Acetate Nanocrystal Tablets to Enhance Oral Bioavailability: Formulation Optimization, Characterization, In Vitro Dissolution and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation Pharmaceutics. Pharmaceutics. 2022 May 26;14(6):1134. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061134.

35. Aleksei E. Machulkin et al Synthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of Small-Molecule Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Abiraterone Conjugate doi: 10.3390/molecules27248795

36. Maria Malamatari et al Pharmaceutical nanocrystals: production by wet milling and applications Drug Discov Today. 2018 Mar;23(3):534-547. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

37. Lei Gao et al Drug nanocrystals: In vivo performances J Control Release. 2012 Jun 28;160(3):418-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 Mar 20.

38. Vivek K Pawar et al. Engineered nanocrystal technology: in-vivo fate, targeting and applications in drug delivery J Control Release. 2014 Jun 10;183:51-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.030. Epub 2014 Mar 23.

39. Li Gao et al The improved antitumor efficacy of continuous intratumoral chemotherapy with cisplatin-loaded implants for the treatment of sarcoma 180 tumor-bearing mice Drug Deliv. 2019; 26(1): 208–215. Published online 2019 Mar 5. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2019.1574938

40. Christine E. Boone et al Active Microneedle Administration of Plant Virus Nanoparticles for Cancer in situ Vaccination Improves Immunotherapeutic Efficacy ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2020 Aug 28; 3(8): 8037–8051.Published online 2020 Aug 7. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.0c01506

41. Seung Hun Park An intratumoral injectable, electrostatic, cross-linkable curcumin depot and synergistic enhancement of anticancer activi https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2017.102

42. Meng Xu et al Evaluation of micelles incorporated into thermosensitive hydrogels for intratumoral delivery and controlled release of docetaxel: A dual approach for in situ treatment of tumors Asian J Pharm Sci. 2018 Jul;13(4):373-382. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

43. Francis Boateng et al Delivery of Nanoparticle-Based Radiosensitizers for Radiotherapy Applications Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Dec 31;21(1):273. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010273.

44. Ashby et al Gliadel wafer implantation combined with standard radiotherapy and concurrent followed by adjuvant temozolomide for treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic literature review World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug 24;14(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0975-5. 

45. Changkyu Lee Development of Injectable and Biodegradable Needle-Type Starch Implant for Effective Intratumoral Drug Delivery and Distribution Int J Nanomedicine. 2022; 17: 4307–4319. Published online 2022 Sep 16 https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S370194

46. Omar P. Troncoso Non-conventional starch nanoparticles for drug delivery applications  https://doi.org/10.1002/mds3.10111

47. Ruican Wang Effects of drying methods on starch crystallinity of gelatinized foxtail millet (α-millet) and its eating quality https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.03.018

48. Hayley B Schultz et al Oral formulation strategies to improve the bioavailability and mitigate the food effect of abiraterone acetate Int J Pharm. 2020 Mar 15;577:119069. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119069. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

49. Upendra Galgatte Preformulation study of poloxamer 407 gels: Effect of additives nternational Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 06(01):130-133

50. Tamás Solymosi Solubility Measurements at 296 and 310 K and Physicochemical Characterization of Abiraterone and Abiraterone Acetate November 12, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.8b00566

Citation

ACS Style

Bakhrushina, E.O., Buraya, L.M., Moiseev, E.D., Shumkova, M.M., Davydova, M.A., Krasnyuk, I.I. Optimizing Abiraterone Delivery through Intratumoral In Situ Implant: A Prospective Pharmaceutical Development Approach. Sciences of Pharmacy 2023, 2(2), 37-45.

AMA Style

Bakhrushina, EO, Buraya, LM, Moiseev, ED, Shumkova, MM, Davydova, MA, Krasnyuk, II. Optimizing Abiraterone Delivery through Intratumoral In Situ Implant: A Prospective Pharmaceutical Development Approach. Sciences of Pharmacy. 2023; 2(2):37-45.

Chicago Style

Elena O Bakhrushina, Liliya M Buraya, Egor D Moiseev, Marina M Shumkova, Maria A Davydova, Ivan I Krasnyuk. 2023. "Optimizing Abiraterone Delivery through Intratumoral In Situ Implant: A Prospective Pharmaceutical Development Approach" Sciences of Pharmacy 2, no. 2:37-45.

We Computerize Sciences, We Publish Sciences, We Are Scientist

ETFLIN

  • Our Product and Service
  • Software
  • Education and Training
  • Article Services
  • In Silico Study
  • Marketplace

Become our peer-reviewer

Join us in shaping the future of scholarly research and making a meaningful contribution to academia.

Newsletter

Receive any update from us

We are open for collaboration in any fields to improve health systems

Please reach us on our social media below.
ETFLIN Social ETFLIN Social ETFLIN Social ETFLIN Social ETFLIN Social ETFLIN Social
© 2015 - 2023 ETFLIN (Palu, Indonesia)